Matthew Slaughter of Dartmouth highlights two major positive -- yes, positive -- effects of globalization on the U.S. auto industry.
First, competition:
For decades the competitive pressures of international trade and investment have forced the Big Three to innovate and boost productivity, starting with gains in fuel efficiency after Japanese car imports surged with the oil-price shocks of the 1970s. In 1998 GM averaged about 46 hours to produce a vehicle in North America. By 2005 that was down to just 35 hours.
And second, insourcing:
In 2005, foreign-headquartered multinationals in motor vehicles and parts employed 334,900 Americans -- at an average annual compensation of $68,125, fully 34% above the private-sector average. Over the decades that the Big Three have struggled with their American operations, foreign auto companies have rapidly established and expanded U.S. production through foreign direct investment.
I see insourcing first hand in my homestate of Indiana, where Toyota has two major plants, Suburu has one, and Honda is now building a large plant that will come online in the next few years. As the domestic companies and suppliers have struggled throughout the Midwest, most severely in Michigan, which is suffering through a one-state recession, the "foreign" companies have filled much of the void. Even closer to home, I've got two Toyota's in the garage -- both, coincidentally, built in Indiana.
-Bret Swanson








Comments
Matthew Slaughter, like many economists, uses statistics to disguise the suffering inflicted upon American auto workers by globalization. There is some indication that he realizes there has been suffering when he asks "How can we continue to realize the aggregate gains of globalization and also address its distribution pressures?" There's a nice euphemism for what has happened to the City of Detroit - "distribution pressures." The fact is globalization has pressured the compensation, including benefits, of American workers downward. The result is to force American workers to accept less so that foreign workers and shareholders can have more. While innovation and productivity gains are great, those who argue in favor of globalization ignore the acres of empty land and abandoned buildings in Detroit. Professor Slaughter should make the trip to Detroit (in an American car?) before criticizing people who want to try to protect what they have.
Robert Kranz
Posted by: Robert Kranz | September 26, 2007 3:20 PM